Libeau v. Fox’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 district · 10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Tabasso Homes, Inc. · 21 Del. Ch. 431 - American Hair & Felt Co. v. Starring · Rosenberg v. Rosenberg · 50 N.J. Super. 454 - Michalski v. Michalski · 105 N.J. Super. 475 - Hotchkin v. Hotchkin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Libeau contends that the Agreement is insufficiently clear and affirmative to waive her statutory right to partition because the Agreement does not specifically state that the Housemates were waiving their rights to seek partition. That argument, however, misunderstands the clarity required for an effective waiver. The waiving contract need not contain an explicit disclaimer of partition rights. Rather, the contract need only contain a procedure for the co-owners to sell their interests that is inconsistent with the later maintenance of a partition action. When a contract provides an exit mechanism that is subject to certain conditions, and the filing of a partition action would allow an exiting party to escape those conditions, the exiting party’s decision to sign the contract constitutes a waiver of the statutory right of partition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Libeau v. Fox
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.