Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 880 F.2d 1 - Byrd v. Armontrout

Byrd v. Armontrout’s Empirical Analysis

880 F.2d 1 · 1989

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2010 · most notably Herrera v. Collins (1993), State v. Perez (2009)

40 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

5601989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Batson v. Kentucky · Wainwright v. Sykes · Townsend v. Sain · Witherspoon v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it bears upon the constitutionality of the petitioner's detention”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “probably produce an acquittal on retrial”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The policies furthered by proper application of the marital privilege in any of its forms are quite distinct from the concerns for fairness and reliability protected by the Due Process Clause. Thus, Byrd's argument that the privilege was misapplied, even if it were correct, would not establish a constitutional due process violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.