Harrison v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
880 F.2d 1279 · 1989
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2017
9 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Wainwright v. Sykes · Engle v. Isaac · Loper v. Beto · Copeland v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he rule in Alabama is that a conviction based upon a plea of nolo contendere is inadmissible in evidence in other proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the results of the proceeding would have been different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Scott v. Dugger“The state, however, did not raise this issue, and consequently has waived its procedural bar.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hunter v. Moore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.