Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 880 F.2d 1287 - Andrews Df v. Ledbetter

Andrews Df v. Ledbetter’s Empirical Analysis

880 F.2d 1287 · 1989

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
February 2011
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2011

8 federal appellate · 3 district ·

801989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975)

Relies on Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District Bd of Ed Westchester County v. Rowley · Honig v. Doe · School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of Education · Kahn v. Grant · In re Martin-Trigona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “by asserting that the state educational agency is primarily and ultimately responsible for the Act's implementation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “indicates that Congress intended to grant an LEA [such as Seneca Falls] statutory standing to bring suit to compel ... [another] agency to fulfill its statutory duties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “confined to the specific context of disputes involving IEPs of particular children ... [and i]n no way ... indicate[d] that the power of ... district courts to effect equitable relief in these well-defined statutory-back actions extend[s] to a suit seeking broad injunctive relief and lacking statutory basis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.