Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 880 F.2d 319 - Baker ex rel. Baker v. Sullivan

Baker ex rel. Baker v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

880 F.2d 319 · 1989

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
August 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2015

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

901989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Hale v. Bowen · Cain v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · Powell v. Heckler · Layton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining whether an applicant is the child ... of a[n] ... insured individual ..., the Secretary shall apply such law as would be applied in determining the devolution of intestate personal property by the courts of the State in which such insured individual ... was domiciled at the time of his death.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “As a legal matter, the Appeals Council could determine that the state court judgment was not binding on the Secretary on the issue of paternity of the children ..., particularly when the Secretary is not a party to the state court action, and no opposing interests were presented in the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.