Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 880 F.2d 621 - Rossy v. Roche Products, Inc.

Rossy v. Roche Products, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

880 F.2d 621 · 1989

Citation profile

110
cited by 110 later decisions
December 2024
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 58 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 110 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Medina-Munoz v. Rj Reynolds Tobacco Company (1990), Griggs-Ryan v. Smith (1990)

40 federal appellate · 58 district ·

61019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins · Patterson v. McLean Credit Union

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “our review will be most searching in cases, such as this, that turn upon the issue of motivation or intent.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is not to second-guess the business decisions of an employer, imposing [its] subjective judgment[ ] of which person would best fulfill the responsibilities of a certain job.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “there existed any factual issues that needed to be resolved before the legal issues could be decided.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.