Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 880 F.3d 1089 - Batterton v. Dutra Group

Batterton v. Dutra Group’s Empirical Analysis

880 F.3d 1089 · 2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
June 2019
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 46 U.S.C. § 30303 (Death on the High Seas Act)

Relies on Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc. · The Harrisburg · Miles v. Apex Marine Corp. · Michigan Central Railroad v. Vreeland · Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whatever room might [have] be[en] left to support broadening Miles to cover punitive damages”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “historically, punitive damages have been available and awarded in general maritime actions,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “was cut off by [this] Court's decision in Atlantic Sounding ,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.