Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 880 F.3d 1207 - Lee v. McCardle

Lee v. McCardle’s Empirical Analysis

880 F.3d 1207 · 2018

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2020

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

3020182020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 362

Relies on Bennett v. Spear · Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn. · Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins · 134 S. Ct. 1377 - Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc. · Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We review bankruptcy-court orders granting summary judgment in adversarial proceedings de novo, and affirm if 'there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When hearing an appeal from a district court's review of a bankruptcy-court order, 'we independently review the bankruptcy court's decision, applying the same standard as the ... district court.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to protect the debtor from collection efforts and to protect creditors from inequitable treatment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.