Mance v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
880 F.3d 183 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)
Relies on Ward v. Rock Against Racism · Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia · District of Columbia v. Heller · Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena · Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not 'longstanding regulatory measures.' " Mance v. Sessions , 880 F.3d 183 , 188 (5th Cir. 2018) (quoting McDonald v. City of Chi. , 561 U.S. 742 , 786, 130 S.Ct. 3020 , 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010) (plurality opinion) ). As Judge Owen's concurring opinion highlights, "the Government has offered no evidence that an in-state sales requirement has a founding-era analogue or was historically understood to be within the ambit of the permissible regulation of commercial sales of firearms at the time the Bill of Rights was ratified.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Mance v. Sessions“for any licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector to sell or deliver ... any firearm to any person who the licensee knows or has reasonable cause to believe does not reside in ... the State in which the licensee's place of business is located”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mance v. Sessions“for any person, other than a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector to transport into or receive in the State where he resides ... any firearm purchased or otherwise obtained by such person outside that State”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mance v. Sessions
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.