Singh v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
880 F.3d 220 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Ramsameachire v. Ashcroft · Xiu Xia Lin v. Mukasey · Efe v. Ashcroft · Mikhael v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Chun v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may rely on any inconsistency or omission in making an adverse credibility determination as long as the 'totality of the circumstances' establishes that an asylum applicant is not credible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ghotra v. Whitaker“) denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ghotra v. Whitaker“from the totality of the circumstances, ... no reasonable fact-finder”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ghotra v. Whitaker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.