Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 880 F.3d 319 - Easterling v. Thurmer

Easterling v. Thurmer’s Empirical Analysis

880 F.3d 319 · 2018

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
September 2021
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan · Turner v. Safley · Overton Director Michigan Department of Corrections et al. v. Bazzetta et al. · Gray v. Lacke · Pruitt v. Mote

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Prisoners retain a limited constitutional right to intimate association, established by the Supreme Court in [ Turner ], and confirmed in [ Overton ]. Turner holds that limits on prisoners' rights are valid if "reasonably related to legitimate penological interests." 482 U.S. at 89 , 107 S.Ct. 2254 . Overton suggests that limits on family visits with a prisoner may violate that rule if "permanent or for a [long] period" or if "applied in an arbitrary manner." 539 U.S. at 137 , 123 S.Ct. 2162 . We therefore have said, albeit in a nonprecedential decision, that a prisoner-even a sex offender-who alleges that a permanent ban on visits with his minor children has no legitimate justification states a valid constitutional claim. See Harris v. Donahue , 175 Fed.Appx. 746 , 748 (7th Cir. 2006) (unpublished). Today, we confirm, this time in a published opinion, that prison officials may violate the Constitution by permanently or arbitrarily denying an inmate visits with family members in disregard of the factors described in Turner and Overton .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.