Snow v. Pfister’s Empirical Analysis
880 F.3d 857 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Coleman v. Thompson · Giglio v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[S]tate prisoners must give the state courts one full opportunity to resolve any constitutional issues by invoking one complete round of the State's established appellate review process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Weaver v. Nicholson“To exhaust state remedies in the Illinois courts, the prisoner must include his claims in a petition for leave to appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Weaver v. Nicholson“O'Sullivan v. Boerckel , 526 U.S. 838 , 845, 119 S.Ct. 1728 , 144 L.Ed.2d 1 (1999).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Weaver v. Nicholson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.