Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 880 F.3d 895 - Milchtein v. Chisholm

Milchtein v. Chisholm’s Empirical Analysis

880 F.3d 895 · 2018

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
August 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1257

Relies on Younger v. Harris · District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp. · Weinstein v. Bradford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether the federal plaintiff seeks the alteration of a state court's judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.