Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 880 F.3d 993 - Bedford v. Doe

Bedford v. Doe’s Empirical Analysis

880 F.3d 993 · 2018

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance v. Fritz Companies, Inc. · Torgerson v. City of Rochester · Gibson v. American Greetings Corp. · St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Lifecare International, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the moving party shows that there are no genuine disputes of material fact and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.