Keesling v. Beegle’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2021
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
Relies on Reves v. Ernst & Young · Fertel-Rust v. Dane County Social Services · Goren v. New Vision International, Inc. · United States v. Oreto · 151 Ohio App. 3d 103 - State v. Siferd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“makes clear that RICO liability is not limited to those with a formal position in the enterprise, but some part in directing the enterprise's affairs is required. Id. at 177-79 (bold italics added) (footnotes omitted). By contrast, courts in states that have not adopted the participate”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Park.“A person: ⅜ ⅜ ⅜ ⅜ (3) who is employed by or associated with an enterprise, and who knowingly or intentionally conducts or otherwise participates in the activities of that enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; commits corrupt business influence, a Class C felony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“both on persons who conduct the activities of a racketeering enterprise and on those who otherwise participate in the activities of a racketeering enterprise[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Park.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.