Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 880 P.2d 573 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 1998
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dice v. State · Armstrong v. State · Taul v. State · Vigil v. State · McCone v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the course of our review, we consider the entire closing argument and do not take individual sentences or phrases out of context. We also consider the closing argument in the context of the entire trial record.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““(1) the record clearly shows what occurred at trial, (2) transgression of a clear and unequivocal rule of law, and (3) which adversely affected one of [appellant’s] substantial rights. Failure to establish each element of this three-part test precludes a finding of plain error.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(a) A person who knowingly aids or abets in the commission of a felony, or who counsels, encourages, hires, commands or procures a felony to be committed, is an accessory before the fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.