State v. Rabun’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Hudson v. Louisiana · 603 So. 2d 731 - State v. Hearold · Vidrio-Aleman v. United States · 661 So. 2d 442 - State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the evidence required to support a finding of guilty of one crime would also have supported a conviction for the other, the two are the same under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one. The test depends on the evidence necessary for a conviction, not all of the evidence introduced at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“found on the railroad tracks when Watson's cab was discovered was related to that purchase. [3] Although a conviction can be sustained on the uncorroborated testimony of a purported accomplice, the jury”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“should be instructed to treat such testimony with great caution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.