C.E.T. v. K.M.T.’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
April 2014
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 410 So. 2d 416 - Ex Parte Berryhill · 31 Ill. App. 3d 408 - Seniuta v. Seniuta · 125 Cal. App. 2d 109 - Jenkins v. Jenkins · 450 So. 2d 104 - Ex Parte Wilson · Duncan v. Renfrow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We are aware that the practice exists among certain trial courts to conduct private conversations with minors in chambers with the consent of opposing counsel. In the absence of waiver or consent, however, the private interview by the trial court cannot be condoned. To sanction such a procedure would fly squarely in the face of the constitutional right of litigants to a public trial.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.