Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 880 So. 2d 798 - Blanton v. State

880 So. 2d 798 - Blanton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · Pearce v. State · 692 So. 2d 309 - State v. Skolar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “proximity in time [from the opportunity to cross examine] to the direct examination or statement date should have no bearing on how the fact finder assimilates the direct and cross once these statements are admitted into evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 910 So. 2d 901 - Contreras v. State
  2. “was in the pictures and video, which vividly depicted the criminal acts in excruciating detail.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 978 So. 2d 149 - Blanton v. State
  3. “should not be heard to complain about an opportunity squandered”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 978 So. 2d 149 - Blanton v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.