880 So. 2d 956 - Walker v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 708 So. 2d 731 - Evans v. Lungrin · 492 So. 2d 1193 - Bergeron v. Bergeron · Tiffee v. Tiffee · Thompson v. Thompson · 814 So. 2d 773 - Hoskins v. Hoskins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n a decree of joint custody the court shall designate a domiciliary parent except when there is an implementation order to the contrary or for other good cause shown.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“| flOur jurisprudence is clear and extensive that a trial court is not required to mechanically evaluate the article 134 factors considered in determining the best interest of a child. We take that to mean that a literal articulation of the factors considered is unnecessary when a trial court reaches a conclusion regarding a child’s best interest. Although it would certainly be helpful in reviewing a trial court’s disposition pertaining to a child’s best interest, the trial court’s means of weighing and balancing the article 13^ factors need not be specifically stated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the provisions of Title VII of Book I of the Civil Code.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.