Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 880 SW2D 646 - Unsel v. Meier

Unsel v. Meier’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2011

8 state decisions

60199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sutton v. Goldenberg · Lee's Summit Building & Loan Ass'n v. Cross · England v. Poehlman · First National Bank of Carrollton v. Eucalyptus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any party to a suit aggrieved by any judgment of any trial court in any civil cause from which an appeal is not prohibited by the constitution, nor clearly limited in special statutory proceedings, may take his or her appeal to a court having appellate jurisdiction from any: (4) Interlocutory judgments in actions of partition which determine the rights of the partiesf.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.