Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 880 SW2D 944 - Nance v. Pankey

Nance v. Pankey’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on City of Shelbyville v. State Ex Rel. Bedford County · Kelly v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A consent] order is conclusive upon the consenting parties, and can neither be amended nor in any way varied without like consent; nor can it be reheard, appealed from or reviewed upon writ of error. After a consent decree has become final it can only be attacked by a suit against the counsel who consented to it or by a bill of review or some original action. Kelly v. Walker, 208 Tenn. 388 , 346 S.W.2d 253, 255-56 (1961); see also City of Shelbyville v. State ex rel. Bedford County, 220 Tenn. 197 , 415 S.W.2d 139, 144 (1967).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.