Anderson v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
881 F.2d 1 · 1989
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably Sharkey v. Quarantillo (2008), Benzman v. Whitman (2008)
3 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 42 U.S.C. § 1395F (§ 1814 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395L (§ 1833 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395R (§ 1839 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395U (§ 1842 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395Z (§ 1863 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal. · Hagans v. Lavine · Heckler v. Ringer · Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family Physicians · Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Independent Federation of Flight Attendants
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a clear right in the plaintiff to the relief sought; (2) a plainly defined and peremptory duty on the defendant's part to do the act in question; and (3) lack of another available, adequate remedy.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“mandamus jurisdiction theoretically can be invoked to permit judicial review of [a] Part B determination[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.