Phillips Petroleum Securities Litigation Ca 85-14 Hudson v. Phillips Petroleum Company Ca 85-45 Hudson’s Empirical Analysis
881 F.2d 1236 · 1989
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 50 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 159 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably In re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation (1997), Lawrence Greebel Richard Crane Brian Robinson John Ann Somers v. Ftp Software Inc (1999)
41 federal appellate · 50 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78M (§ 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co. · Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Basic Inc. v. Levinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 159 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an extreme departure from the standards of ordinary care ... which presents a danger of misleading ... that is either known to the defendant or is so obvious that the actor must be aware of it.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a material fact necessary in order to make . . . statements made . . . not misleading.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.