Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 881 F.2d 696 - Menefield v. Borg

Menefield v. Borg’s Empirical Analysis

881 F.2d 696 · 1989

Citation profile

116
cited by 116 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

62 federal appellate · 1 district · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 116 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2021 · most notably 27 Cal. 4th 1041 - People v. Koontz (2002), Marshall v. Rodgers (2013)

62 federal appellate · 1 district · 25 state decisions — followed in 12 states

54019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Faretta v. California · Gideon v. Wainwright · United States v. Wade · Penson v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'if failure to pursue strategies or remedies results in a loss of significant rights,'”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “at least in the absence of extraordinary circumstances, an accused who requests an attorney at the time of a motion for a new trial is entitled to have one appointed, unless the government can show that the request is made for a bad faith purpose.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The trial judge sits as the '13th juror' in evaluating the weight”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.