Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 881 F.2d 902 - Smith v. Phillips

Smith v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

881 F.2d 902 · 1989

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
6
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 8 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably Stewart v. Donges (1990), United Nuclear Corporation v. Cranford Insurance Company (1990)

17 federal appellate · 8 district · 6 state decisions

17019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co. · Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen Corp. · Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Independent Federation of Flight Attendants

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A voluntary dismissal by stipulation under [Federal Rules of Civil Procedure] Rule 41(a)(1)(h) is of right, cannot be conditioned by the court, and does not call for the exercise of any discretion on the part of the court. Once the stipulation is filed, the action on the merits is at an end.... “[A]n unconditional dismissal [ordinarily] terminates ... jurisdiction except for the limited purpose of reopening and setting aside the judgment of dismissal [if any] within the scope allowed by [Rule] 60(b).””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “says we agree with the 7th Circuit that ... an unconditional dismissal terminates federal jurisdiction, except for the limited purpose of reopening and setting aside the judgment of dismissal with the scope of Rule 60(b). So it seems to me you’ve got to use 60(b) to reopen and set aside the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Even after an appeal has been taken the district court may consider applications for attorneys' fees because they are considered wholly collateral to the merits ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.