Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 881 F.2d 939 - Holmes v. Silver Wings Aviation, Inc.

Holmes v. Silver Wings Aviation, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

881 F.2d 939 · 1989

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
February 2021
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 12 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably Lopez v. Behles (1994), 27 1157 74903 Andreuccetti

19 federal appellate · 12 district ·

28019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 503

Relies on Sloan v. Hicks · Kane v. Johns-Manville Corp. · Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. United States · Fondiller v. Robertson · In re El San Juan Hotel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “directly and adversely affected pecuniarily.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “These decisions reflect the understandable concern that if appellate standing is not limited, bankruptcy litigation will become mired in endless appeals brought by the myriad of parties who are indirectly affected by every bankruptcy court order.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The [debtors'] Chapter 13 plan has been confirmed.. .. [T]he total amount to be paid by the [debtors] under the latest plan is $13,050.00.... Inasmuch as the [debtors] have agreed to a payout totalling $13,-050.00, they make no effective argument as to how they can be aggrieved by its allocation among the payees. They are, apparently, not liable for any further payout. Thus, since they are not directly and adversely affected pecuniarily beyond the extent to which they have already agreed, they have no standing to contest the award of attorney's fees at issue here.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.