Reinbold v. Thorpe’s Empirical Analysis
881 F.3d 536 · 2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 363 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 544
Relies on Butner v. United States · Citizens Bank of Md. v. Strumpf · Lewis v. Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit · Moody v. Amoco Oil Co. · 71 Ill. 2d 563 - Kujawinski v. Kujawinski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the divorce court eventually divides marital property, the obtaining spouse's contingent interest in that property ripens into a full ownership interest. Conversely, the spouse who is not awarded the property sees his contingent interest vanish.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.