Rush v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “1) the degree of concern, suspicion, or knowledge that a violation has occurred, 2) the degree of intrusion the method of the search or seizure imposes on the citizen's ordinary activities, and 3) the extent of law enforcement needs.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Scott Randall v. State of Indiana · Brown v. State

2. “'exigencies of the situation' make the needs of law enforcement so compelling that the warrantless search is objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Trotter v. State

3. “Indiana citizens have been concerned not only with personal privacy but also with safety, security, and protection from crime.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Brown v. State