Rudden v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
December 2010
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McClain v. State · Asitonia v. State · Williams v. State · Sam v. State · State v. Bumpus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At one extreme, an attempted first-degree murder might cause no injury at all to the victim and might involve conduct falling far short of any immediate threat of deadly harm-the type of slight step beyond mere preparation that minimally qualifies as an attempt. By contrast, at the opposite extreme, an attempted first-degree murder might consist of a completed act of calculated deadly force that, through no lack of effort or intent by the offender, happens to fall slightly short of the mark, causing lasting and near-fatal injuries instead of death.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“As the gap between attempt and completion narrows, the justification for disparate treatment of an offender convicted of attempted murder, [as opposed to] the completed crime, diminishes commensurately; as the crimes grow similar, so should the sentences.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“appears to have been intended ... to reflect the exceptionally broad range of conduct encompassed within the definition of attempted first-degree murder”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.