People v. Halstead’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 2020
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Missouri v. Hunter · Newton v. State · People v. Terry · People v. Bartowsheski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“However, if the impeachment is general and not limited to specific facts, then the jury should have access to all the relevant facts, including consistent and inconsistent statements.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Banks · People v. Clark“differs from the [greater] offense . only in the respect that a less serious injury or risk of injury to the same person . suffices to establish its commission.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“'If the impeachment goes only to specific facts, then only prior consistent statements regarding those specific facts are relevant and admissible”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Banks · People v. Clark
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.