People v. Dillingham’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
August 2004
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cumhuriyet v. People · People v. Deadmond · People v. Johnson · People v. Quinonez · People v. Borquez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[wjhile there was no legal obligation for the victim to offer such a reward, his payment nevertheless constituted an item of actual pecuniary damages incurred by him as a result of criminal conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`actual, pecuniary damages sustained by the victim' as a result of the defendant's conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Grace v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.