881 So. 2d 1137 - Huck v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · Oklahoma v. New Mexico · Licht v. Texas Commerce Bank · 559 So. 2d 187 - State v. Law · 830 So. 2d 792 - Pagan v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact in understanding the evidence or in determining a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify about it in the form of an opinion; however, the opinion is admissible only if it can be applied to evidence at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“If, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, a rational trier of fact could find the existence of the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, then there is sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[W]e conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the medical examiner to testify regarding the cause and manner of death [homicide] of the victim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.