881 So. 2d 1157 - Murphy v. Hurst’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. State · 659 So. 2d 239 - De La Rosa v. Zequeira · 814 So. 2d 334 - Roberts Ex Rel. Estate of Roberts v. Tejada · 580 So. 2d 315 - Bernal v. Lipp · 440 So. 2d 378 - MOBIL CHEMICAL CO., a DIV. OF MOBIL CORP. v. Hawkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the facts must be relevant and material to jury service in the case; (2) the facts must be concealed by the juror on voir dire examination; and (3) the failure to discover the concealed facts must not be due to the want of diligence of the complaining party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.