881 So. 2d 1180 - Powell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2009
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 630 So. 2d 521 - Hale v. State · 829 So. 2d 901 - Swett v. State · 773 So. 2d 644 - Durr v. State · 867 So. 2d 469 - Fuller v. State · Kiedrowski v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is entirely possible that a defendant could commit an enumerated offense subject to PRR designation and another offense not enumerated, or one for which the state does not seek such a sentence, in the same criminal episode.... [T]he trial judge should not be barred from imposing consecutive sentences, as long as the PRR sentence is served first.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he PRR statute is properly viewed as a minimum mandatory statute, which establishes a sentence in Florida”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.