Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 881 So. 2d 227 - Griffith v. Pell

881 So. 2d 227 - Griffith v. Pell’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 842 So. 2d 527 - MAs v. MISS. DEPT. HUMAN SERVICES · Logan v. Logan · 258 So. 2d 233 - Simpson v. Rast · 458 So. 2d 711 - Pearson v. Pearson · R.E. v. C.E.W.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Current case law provides that paternity suits have limited purposes. Where scientific evidence points overwhelmingly towards one man as the father of a child, paternity is established, and the only matter left to resolve in the paternity action is that of support. Rafferty v. Perkins, 757 So.2d 992, 996 (Miss.2000). * * * The best interest of the child standard is to be applied when determining custody issues, such as in a divorce proceeding. Although a natural parent is entitled to custody of a minor child, there are circumstances under which that entitlement may be set aside in favor of a third party, including stepparent. That, however, is a matter better resolved in the appeal of the Pell divorce proceedings and not in the Griffith paternity action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.