881 So. 2d 261 - Carr v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

cited by 3 later decisions

states following

August 2018

most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 826 So. 2d 719 - Russell v. Performance Toyota, Inc. · 615 So. 2d 590 - Edwards v. State · 553 So. 2d 505 - Fleming v. State · 403 So. 2d 867 - Harrigill v. State · 792 So. 2d 950 - Presley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“A reduction or reconsideration of a sentence by a judge must occur prior to the expiration of the sentencing term.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. Bailey v. State
“could have refused to hear this motion because of its noncompliance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 962 So. 2d 640 - Adams v. State
“technically comply with the requirements of the pleading”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 962 So. 2d 640 - Adams v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.