Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 881 So. 2d 300 - Cooley v. Brawner

881 So. 2d 300 - Cooley v. Brawner’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 221 So. 2d 75 - McPherson v. McLendon · Clow Corp. v. JD Mullican, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he Court finds that neither Dr. Rao, nor an agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process on Dr. Rao's behalf, was personally, sufficiently served with process in accordance with the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure 4 within 120 days from the filing of the Complaint herein, after which the statute of limitations herein has also expired.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.