¶2I concur with the majority's opinion. However, I write specially to urge the Alabama Supreme Court to revisit its decisions in Ex parte Johnson and Ex parte Fountain and to clarify what is the appropriate procedure for seeking an out-of-time appeal from the denial or dismissal of a prior Rule 32 petition. *545
881 So. 2d 542
King v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Decided April 26, 2002
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 2002-04-26
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 2007
3 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“to revisit its decisions in Ex parte Johnson and Ex parte Fountain and to clarify what is the appropriate procedure for seeking an out-of-time appeal from the denial or dismissal of a prior Rule 32 petition”
quoted by 1 later decision, including Marshall v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2002-04-26
View the full empirical analysis of this case →