881 So. 2d 587 - State v. Rabb’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “is no less key in the case at bar. We are of the view that luggage located in a public airport is quite different from a house, not only in physical attributes, but also in the historical protection granted by law. In United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1366 (2d Cir.1985), the Second Circuit compared the dog sniff of luggage in Place with that of an apartment, and concluded that”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 920 So. 2d 1175 - State v. Rabb

2. “Based on the information provided by the confidential source, the cultivation of cannabis books and video's located in Mr. Brown's vehicle, the cannabis located in Mr. Brown's vehicle as well as his person and the drug detector dog alert on the residence, your Affiant believes that a cannabis growing operation is located inside the residence.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 920 So. 2d 1175 - State v. Rabb

3. “Katz, 389 U.S. at 361 , 88 S.Ct. 507 . When considering whether law enforcement activity at a house constitutes a search, it is necessary to consider the constitutional protections afforded a house throughout the long history of the Fourth Amendment. At the center of the Fourth Amendment stands”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 920 So. 2d 1175 - State v. Rabb