Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 881 SW2D 102 - Damian v. State

Damian v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2018

5 state decisions

20199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 23rd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Bagley · Rose v. State · Ex Parte Duffy · Ex Parte Cruz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the State may not introduce an information or an indictment of a prior conviction if it includes a description of a greater offense for which the defendant was not ultimately convicted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.