Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 881 SW2D 727 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2003
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 183rd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Reading Co. v. CJI Industries, Inc. · Fisher v. Oklahoma · Royster v. State · Todd v. State · Reed v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A person taking a child into custody, without unnecessary delay and without first taking the child to any place other than a juvenile processing office designated under Section 52.025 of this code, shall do one of the following: (1) release the child to a parent ... (2) bring the child before the office or official designated by the juvenile court”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] person taking a child into custody shall promptly give notice of the person's action and a statement of the reason for taking the child into custody to: (1) the child's parent, guardian, or custodian; and (2) the office or official designated by the juvenile board.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.