State v. Perez’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Barker v. Wingo · Ornelas v. United States · Arizona v. Fulminante · Tate v. Howard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when, although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the basis of the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a] trial justice is vested with the inherent authority to sequester witnesses during trial testimony for the purpose of preventing that witness from shaping his or her testimony to conform to that of other witnesses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“accord deference to the trial justice's findings of historical fact unless those findings are clearly erroneous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hasim Munir
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.