Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 882 F.2d 1286 - Coulter v. Vitale

Coulter v. Vitale’s Empirical Analysis

882 F.2d 1286 · 1989

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently February 2015 · most notably Keenan v. City of Philadelphia (1992), Graham v. Sauk Prairie Police Commission (1990)

20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2201989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)

Relies on Beatrice WILLIAMSON, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. HANDY BUTTON MACHINE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee · Will v. Comprehensive Accounting Corp. · Deppe v. Tripp · Bob Willow Motors, Inc. v. General Motors Corp. · Erwin v. County of Manitowoc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “conduct motivated by evil intent or callous indifference to the federally-protected rights of plaintiffs.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “plain error doctrine is not available to protect parties from erroneous jury instructions to which no objection was made at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “controlled by a federal common law of damages imposing uniformity in enforcing the Civil Rights Acts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.