Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 882 F.2d 167 - Geter v. Fortenberry

Geter v. Fortenberry’s Empirical Analysis

882 F.2d 167 · 1989

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
March 2025
most recently cited

25 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Moldowan v. City of Warren (2009), Hale v. Townley (1995)

25 federal appellate ·

18019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Malley v. Briggs · Manson v. Brathwaite

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Geter II ") ("insisting that [witnesses] pick an individual from photo lineups, prodding the witnesses to select another picture when they had chosen incorrectly, and becoming hostile ... when a witness refused to cooperate”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We agree ... that a police officer cannot avail himself of a qualified immunity defense if he procures false identification by unlawful means ..., for such activity violates clearly established constitutional principles.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We examine the plaintiffs' factual allegations only to determine whether they would be sufficient, if proven, to make out a violation of clearly-established law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.