Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

882 F.2d 207

Docket Nos. 87-3651, 87-3689.

Lundblad v. Celeste

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

July 21, 1989.

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 1995

6 federal appellate ·

1 counsel of record

Relies on Lundblad v. Celeste

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-07-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Terrence M. Fay (argued), Asst. Atty. Gen., Environmental Enforcement Sec., Columbus, Ohio, for appellants.

Jeffrey Decile (argued), James Ayers' Law Office, Columbus, Ohio, for appellees.

Prior report: 6th Cir., 874 F.2d 1097.

Before ENGEL, Chief Judge, KEITH, MERRITT, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, KRUPANSKY, WELLFORD, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

¶1

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

¶2

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

¶3

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

¶4

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.

/882/f2d/207 · .json · Public domain