Teamsters Local No v. B & M Transit Inc’s Empirical Analysis
882 F.2d 274 · 1989
Citation profile
32 federal appellate · 4 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Local 802, Associated Musicians of Greater New York v. Parker Meridien Hotel (1998), Hart v. McChristian (2001)
32 federal appellate · 4 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · Bibby v. United States · International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp. · Kelly v. Robinson · St. Martin Evangelical Lutheran Church v. South Dakota
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] district court should not interpret an ambiguous arbitration award. If an award is unclear, the court should send it back to the arbitrator for clarification. When possible, however, a court should avoid remanding a decision to the arbitrator because of the interest in prompt and final arbitration.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Rule 11 requires at a minimum that a party read the document whose terms it is contesting....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schrag v. Dinges a & Schaffer Schrag Aj G R Nickelson · Galen Schrag Merlin Kaufman Michael Maloney Dale McCurry A.J. McCurry Robert McCurry Odel McCurry Cecil McCurry James Meier William G. Schwartz, John R. Nickelson, Individually, and in His Capacity as Administrator of the Estate of Neola Nickelson, James Craig Dodd, Esq. v. Ted Dinges, Jr. Gary Dinges Mark Youngers Charles Brooks Jay Ewing Robert "Bob" Simpson Bonaventure A. Kreutzer, Jr. Denis Dieker Valley Federal Savings & Loan Association Paganica, Inc. Dinges International, Inc. Ag-Marketing Commodities, Inc. Financial Investments, Inc., and Fred Schaffer, Galen Schrag, Merlin Kaufman Michael Maloney Dale McCurry A.J. McCurry Robert McCurry Odel McCurry Cecil McCurry James Meier William G. Schwartz, John R. Nickelson, Individually, and in His Capacity as Administrator of the Estate of Neola Nickelson v. Ted Dinges, Jr. Gary Dinges Charles Brooks Jay Ewing Fredf Shaffer Robert "Bob" Simpson Bonaventure A. Kreutzer, Jr. Denis Dieker Valley Federal Savings & Loan Association Paganica, Inc. Dinges International, Inc. Ag-Marketing Commodities, Inc. Financial Investments, Inc., and Mark Youngers, Galen Schrag Merlin Kaufman Michael Maloney Dale McCurry A.J. McCurry Robert McCurry Odel McCurry Cecil McCurry James Meier William G. Schwartz, John R. Nickelson, Individually, and in His Capacity as Administrator of the Estate of Neola Nickelson v. Ted Dinges, Jr. Gary Dinges Mark Youngers Charles Brooks Jay Ewing Fred Shaffer Bonaventure A. Kreutzer, Jr Denis Dieker Valley Federal Savings & Loan Association Paganica, Inc. Dinges International, Inc. Ag-Marketing Commodities, Inc. Financial Investments, Inc., and Robert "Bob" Simpson, AKA Bob Simpson““a defendant’s failure to vacate [an] arbitration award within the prescribed time period for such a motion precludes it from seeking affirmative relief in a subsequent action to enforce the award.” This holding is intended to enhance the speed and effectiveness of arbitration, to provide fair review of the arbitrator’s decision, and to preclude the losing party from dragging out proceedings in order to dilute the integrity of the arbitration award.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.