Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 882 F.2d 34 - Arnone v. Bowen

Arnone v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

882 F.2d 34 · 1989

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
May 2019
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 16 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Albert Shaw v. Shirley S. Chater, as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (2000), Pratts v. Chater (1996)

10 federal appellate · 16 district ·

5901989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Garner v. Heckler · Detenber v. American Universal Insurance Co · Berry v. Schweiker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'In reviewing district court decisions in disability cases, we undertake our own plenary review of the administrative record to determine whether substantial evidence supports the [Commissioner's] denial of benefits,'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[Plaintiff's] failure to present any medical evidence from that period seriously undermines his contention that he was continuously disabled during that time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.