Karamanos v. Egger’s Empirical Analysis
882 F.2d 447 · 1989
Citation profile
17 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2011 · most notably Saul v. United States (1991), Berry v. Hollander (1991)
17 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 1206 · 5 U.S.C. § 2301 (Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002) · 5 U.S.C. § 2302
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Carlson v. Green · Bush v. Lucas · United States v. Fausto · Schweiker v. Chilicky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“individuals whose constitutional rights are violated may sue federal officials for damages under the Constitution without specific statutory authority.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Congress is the body charged with making the inevitable compromises required in the design of a massive and complex welfare benefits program ... and we see no legal basis that would allow us to revise its decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.