Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 882 F.2d 605 - Fletcher v. Marino

Fletcher v. Marino’s Empirical Analysis

882 F.2d 605 · 1989

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
May 2021
most recently cited

14 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably Brown v. Eli Lilly & Co. (2011), Harriscom Svenska AB v. Harris Corp. (1991)

14 federal appellate ·

9019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1973 (§ 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965) · 5 U.S.C. § 7324

Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization · Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National Union · Anderson v. Celebrezze · United Public Workers of America v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “neither told the parties how their leaders will be selected nor hampered the leaders' role within the party. All that it [did was] to limit such leaders' outside activities in one small aspect. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. Kraham v. Lippman
  2. “limit[ing] such leaders' outside activities in one small aspect . . . in furtherance of the rational and legitimate goal of deterring improper political influence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. Kraham v. Lippman
  3. “[w]here the reasons for the entry of judgment [we]re obvious... and a remand to the district court would result only in unnecessary delay in the appeal process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.